Dolphin Orthodontic Software Manual And Computerized
Instead of paying for a complex off-the-shelf solution, practices can select and pay only for the solutions they need. Chatsworth California Dolphin Imaging and Management Solutions: imaging, management, Express your opinion about this website:Dolphin Management is a flexible orthodontic practice management software that includes powerful tools and features practices need to stay ahead of the curve, including treatment cards, customizable reports, scheduling and more. Objective: To evaluate and compare the error in cephalometric measurements by manual and computerized methods using the softwares Dolphin Imaging version 11.0 and Dentofacial Planner version 7.02.Orthodontic and Practice Management Software 1(818)435-1368 9200 Eton Ave. Infolab has over the years gained significant experience and expertise in the distribution, assistance, and consulting of management software dedicated to. Born in 2001 and developing as a company dedicated to technical assistance and consulting. Infolab snc is the only authorized Dolphin distributor for the territories of Italy Greece & Cyprus.
The computerized method using the Dentofacial Planner software showed the highest reliability, followed by the manual method, while the Dolphin Imaging software was the least effective and more likely to produce systematic errors in the identification of points. Dolphin Management and Imaging software allows us to efficiently and securely record detailed.Conclusions: According to the present results, the three cephalometric methods have proven to be accurate, since they presented few systematic errors. Dolphin products tightly integrate with digital x-ray units, CBCT systems, telephonic solutions and Web-enabled applications, and are compatible with the latest operating systems and computers including Intel-based Macintosh Results: The results showed statistically significant differences, especially between measurements evaluated on the Dolphin software and by manual tracing (p>0.05).SureSmile Pioneering Innovations in Digital Orthodontics. You can send active URL links to MyOrthodontist users via secure chat messages.Dolphin Imaging & Management Solutions provides high-quality imaging, diagnostic, and case presentation software for dental specialty professionals worldwide. For analysis of results, the dependent t test was used to compare the error of each method (intragroup error) comparison of measurements between the three methods was performed by the one-way ANOVA and Tukey test in the presence of significant result.4 Dolphin MyOrthodontist Setup and User’s Guide June 2021 V5.2 We added a long press to enable patients to copy and paste text in chat messages. A calibrated operator conducted 90 manual and 180 digital cephalometric tracings, using 8 angular measurements (SNA, SNB, ANB, FMA, 1.NA, 1.NB, SN-Occlusal, SN-GoGn) and 5 linear measurements (1-NA, 1-NB, Co-Gn, Co-A e LAFH).
This study aimed to compare the error in cephalometric measurements with manual and computerized methods using the softwares Dolphin Imaging and Dentofacial Planner, aiming to evaluate the reliability of cephalometrics techniques analyzed.This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of manual cephalometrics compared to two specific softwares and quantified the degree of reliability of identification of cephalometric points manually and digitally, evaluating and comparing the outcomes achieved and comparing them to each other, to aid the clinician in selecting the best option for cephalometrics, either manual or computerized. Several systems and formats are available to produce, store, recover, visualize and share these images. Digital images are currently routinely used in the orthodontic practice.
The study included only lateral cephalograms with optimal quality, since the goal was to analyze the accuracy of identification of points, which is directly influenced by the quality of radiographs. Individuals presenting hypodontia or missing permanent teeth, deciduous teeth, impacted or unerupted teeth or any previous orthodontic treatment were excluded from the sample.The radiographs were selected by observing the quality of image (contrast/density) and sharpness of points to be marked. The basic criterion for sample selection was presence of the permanent maxillary and mandibular first molars.
Schematic drawing of cephalometric tracing.Figure 3. After adaptation of an Ultraphan sheet (G&H Wire Company), manual tracing (Figure 3) of each radiograph was performed following a minimum interval of one month for repetition.Figure 2. The cephalometric points were identified following a sequence pre-established by the examiner, using 0.5mm mechanical pencil with the aid of ruler, protractor and setsquare for achievement of cephalometric measurements. The cephalogram (Figure 2) was traced in a darkened room. One sheet of Ultraphan paper (G&H Wire Company) with 0.07-mm thickness was adapted on each radiograph.
After tracings, the data were plotted and statistically analyzed by the dependent t test to evaluate the intragroup error. Statistical analysisAll radiographs were evaluated and traced by a single examiner, previously calibrated using 10 lateral cephalograms for each measurement technique, both the manual method and the two computerized softwares used in this study.For evaluation of intra-examiner error, all points were identified twice on all 45 cephalograms. Tracing on the dolphin Imaging software.
Results of error of manual tracing, comparing the first and second measurements (dependent t test) (N=45).Table 2. The three cephalometric methods presented to be properly accurate, since they presented few systematic errors.Table 1. ResultsResults are presented in Tables 1-4. Results were considered statistically significant at p<0.05.
0 kommentar(er)
